Use of Conflict - The Fifth Achievement
Robert R. Blake and Jane
S. Mouton
FOUR CLASSICAL SOLUTIONS FOR RESOLVING CONFLICTS
In the conduct of society there are at least four major
and different kinds of formal, structural arrangements which we rely on for
resolving differences. They are the scientific method, politics, law, with
its associated police powers; and organizational hierarchy.
WHAT IS THE FIFTH ACHIEVEMENT
There is another essential ingredient. It is sharply
increased understanding by every man of the roots of conflict and the human
skills of gaining the resolution of differences. The acquisition of such
insight and skill by every man could provide a social foundation for
reaching firm and sound understandings on a direct man-to-man basis of the
inevitable disagreements that arise in conducting the national life. This
kind of deepened skill in the direct resolution of differences could do much
to provide a realistic prospect that the antagonisms, cleavages, or
injustices real and imagined in society today can be reduced if not
eliminated. It offers the promise that the sicknesses of alienation and
apathy, the destructive aggressions, and the organization-man mentality can
be healed.
The Fifth Achievement, then, is in the establishments of
a problem-solving society where differences among men are subject to
resolution through insights that permit protagonists themselves to identify
and implement solutions to their differences upon the basis of committed
agreement. That men ultimately will be able to work out, face to face,
their differences is a hoped-for achievement of the future. Extending
their capacity to do so could reduce the number of problems brought before
the bench or dealt with through hierarchy. At the same time, scientific and
political processes could be strengthened if progress were made in this
direction. Even more important, it could perhaps lead to the resolution of
many conflicts on a local level that block the development of a creative and
committed problem-solving community. Success in meeting this challenge in
the period ahead is perhaps the surest way to preserve and strengthen the
values of a free society while protecting and even strengthening the
privilege of having and expressing differences.
When it is possible for a man to make a choice form among several
solutions, and when he can make this choice without infringing upon another
man's freedom or requiring his cooperation, there is genuine autonomy. This
is real freedom.
Under a 9,9 approach, disagreement is valued as an
inevitable result of the fact that strong-minded people have convictions
about what is right. A man says, "Nothing is sacrosanct. What are the facts?
What are the causes" What are the conclusions?" Reservations and emotions
that interrupt agreement based on logic and data are confronted through
candid discussion of them directly with the person involved in the
disagreement. Insight and resolution are possible but involve maturity and
real human skill. This approach may be time-consuming in the short run but
time-conserving over the long tern. It permits men to disagree, to work out
their disagreements in the light of facts and ultimately to understand one
another. Such problem-soling constructiveness in conflict situations is the
fundamental basis for realizing the Fifth Achievement.
The Conflict Grid is useful in seeing the more subtle
connections among conflict and conformity and creative problem solving.
Conformity to the 9,1 authority-obedience demands that are involved in
hierarchical rank is exemplified by the boss, teacher, or parent who gives
the orders to subordinates., students, or children who are expected to obey.
In another type of conformity, the rules of relationship
are, "Don't say anything if you can't say something nice" (1,9).
Togetherness, social intimacy, and warmth engendered by yielding one's
convictions in the interests of personal acceptance are certainly
objectionable solutions in a society where having and expressing differences
is relied on as the basis for finding sound courses of action. It can
produce a quorum of agreement but smother creative problem solving in
sweetness and love. The kind of dis-agreement that might provoke resentment
is avoided. The opportunity for creative problem solving to emerge is
absent.
Another kind of conformity relates to adhering to the
form and not to the substance of life. Here people conform by going through
the motions expected of them, treadmilling through the days, months, and
years (1,1). In this way, survival is accomplished by being visible without
being seem.
Organization-man conformity (5,5) entails positively
embracing the status quo with minimum regard for the soundless of status quo
requirements, Yet, even here, as new problems arise, differences appear and
disagreements become evident . There are several kind of 5,5 actions that of
shallow estimation may give the appearance of approaching problems from an
altered, fresh, and original point of view...Deeper examination of 5,5
behavior leads to the conclusion that imitation rather that innovation is
the rule.
Flexibility is a highly valued component in mature and effective
behavior. But is it not contradictory to advocate flexibility on the one
hand and to forewarn against compromise on the other? This question is
important to clarify.
Flexibility calls for deliberate examination of options and alternatives.
It means having back-up tactics that permit swift resolution of unforeseen
circumstances, a climate that permits people to move back and forth and in
and out from one situation to another, but based on facts, data, and logic
of the situation as it unfolds.
Thus there are actions to adjust a difference to keep
peace and actions to adjust to altered circumstances for better results. It
is most important to distinguish between the two kinds, Flexibility for
better results is likely to have a stamp of 9,9 an it, 'flexibility' to keep
peace by avoiding clash of personalities is in the 5,5 area. One is
intervening and promotes creativity. The other leads to the perpetuation of
the organization-man mentality of status quo rigidities.
In the final analysis, conformity is to be valued. The
problem is to ensure that the thinking of men conforms with sound purposes
and premises. Conformity which means adherence to premise of human logic so
that decisions reached are furthering growth capacity in sound and
fundamental ways is what every individual might be expected to want. It is
what man should want in the underpinnings of his daily interactions. It is
conformity it this level that promotes the pursuit of creative and
innovative solutions. Only when the values of a nation stimulate
experimentation and promote a truly constructive attitude toward discover
and innovation is the full potential from creative efforts available as a
source of thrust for replacing outmoded status quo conformities with more
problem-solving requirements (9,9).
...But a 9,9 foundation of interdependence can build a
strong basis for an open, problem-solving society in which men can have and
express differences and yet be interrelated in ways that promote the mutual
respect, common goals, and trust and understanding they must have to achieve
results in ways that lead to personal gratification and maturity.
POSSIBILITIES OF THE FIFTH ACHIEVEMENT FOR STRENGTHENING
SOCIETY
This challenge to America, the need for men to learn to
confront outmoded status quo requirements and to manage to resultant
conflict in such ways as to promote creative problem solving, promises much
for the decades ahead, if we can meet and master it.
Consider for a moment the possibility of success in
mastering this Fifth Achievement. What might it mean?
1. Enriched family life rather than the steady rise in
the divorce rate.
2. Sounder child rearing evidenced in teem-age young-
ster capable of expression and action in dealing in a problem - solving
rather than a protest way with adults and the institutions of society who
are capable of interacting in an equally sound way.