Infanticide in China
Li Jianguo and Zhang Xiaoying
THE NEW YORK TIMES,
MONDAY, APRIL 11, 1983
* *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
According to news
reports in China's dailies, during the last two years large numbers of female infants have
been butchered, drowned or left to die, and numbers of women have suffered gross
maltreatment as a result of nation-wide implementation of the Government's population
control policy. This shocking situation, which the Government must take immediate steps to
stop, deserves to be brought to the attention of the United Nations.
We learn, from The
People's Daily, The Liberation Daily, The Worker's Daily, Canton Evening News and The
Chinese Youth that these illegal incidents hap-pen not only in villages but in cities as
well. In the areas most seriously affected, female infants and
women who have given birth to female infants have been forced to die. As a result,
nationwide, male infants have begun to far outnumber female infants.
The Government's
birth-control policy has reduced population growth rate to 1.2 percent -- it is 2 percent
in other developing countries -- but the rate reportedly was creeping toward 1.3 of 1.4
percent, and this means the Government may not meet the 1.2 billion target set for the
year 2000. A census last July put the population at 1,008,175,288 -- five million more
than was expected. The customary preference for a male child, pressure to limit new
families to just one child, bonuses for cooperating parents and a warning that families
who have more than one will be financially penalized inevitably have led to infanticide.
On March 3, The
People's Daily said: "At present, the phenomena of butchering, drowning and leaving
to die female infants and maltreating women who have given birth to female infants have
been very serious. It has become a grave social problem." The People's Daily said, on
Jan, 31, that because of investigations and statistics from Shenyang, Anshan, Benxi and
six other cities, in the last year 196 women went to local offices of the Chinese Women's
Association to report maltreatment." Apparently, the most seriously affected
provinces are Anhui, Liaoning, handong, Hebei, Guangdong and Sichuan.
Both of us, citizens
of the People's Republic of China, are deeply ashamed of, and mortified by, this utter
barbarism and disregard of humanity. We are filled with boundless indignation that during
this last quarter of the 20th century such atrocities take place in our country. They
reflect, on the one hand, the persistence of feudal thought and the traditional
indifference to the welfare of women and
female children, and
on the other, the backward, benighted conditions of poverty and ignorance under which most
parts of China still lives.
But traditional
prejudice and economic backwardness notwithstanding, we strongly feel that all elements of
our Government concerned with implementation of the new population policy should be held
directly accountable for the prevalence of such tragic incidents. Infanticide need not be
an inevitable outcome of the policy. Apparently, the affected units and organizations have
not adopted a policy of "gentle persuasion and education" to achieve the desired
goal of birth control and population control but have callously exerted political
pressures and adopted extreme political measure for implementation of the policy.
It is true that the
population-control policy has effectively reduced China's population growth. Nevertheless,
these other, unintended results of such a policy contradict fundamental values of
humanism, ethics and civilization. The government, by permitting the news reports of the
atrocities, obviously indicates that it opposed them. But, deplorably, it has not
exercised its power to stop them, as far as we know.
Ironically, Qian
Xinzh-ong, chairman of the Chinese National Committee on Birth Control and Population
Planning, in June is to come to the United Nations to receive an award as the
representative of the country that has been most effective in implementing birth control
and population planning. But if China has curtailed population growth and lengthened the
life of an average individual at the tragic expense of the lives of newborn girls, would
it not be the greatest irony possible for Mr. Qian to receive this award at this time?
Because of this
situation, we hope that the Secretary General, Javier Perez de Cuellar, will take
appropriate action to inform the concerned United Nations agencies -- with the full
cooperation of the Chinese Government -- so that they may start a detailed investigation
of this matter and, using all the resources at their command, end these horrors as soon as
possible. To protect its dignity, we suggest that the United Nations should postpone
giving Mr. Qian the award pending an investigation by responsible United Nations bodies
and a report from Peking that this deplorable situation has ceased.
|
Dear Sir (from the writer),
In 1982 a lot of bad things were done in China. In
China? What to you think
about of the other countries. Children
were killed. In 1928? Or in 1882? In New York? Or in 1838? For Blacks, too? Whites?
Killing infant babies! Unborn? In slavery? How? Now? For what reason?
Do we still need more men for the "War Machine"? "Whats to
do?" After the 18 year older, who will be living? The baby? You? The Greeks child?
Catholics child? Could you have done better? Or the Jewish child? Killed? Or if that
child kills some other child? Or in prison. Why? How? Now? Try it. Tell it to the Lord,
and to another person.
|
JT(1-12-1299)
Li Jianguo and Zhang
Xiaoyingthese are pseudonyms--are students from the People's Republic of China who are
studying in the United States. They intend to return
to China. |